Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Celine Naef vs Himeno Sakatsume Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Naef vs Sakatsume analysis and find out who is favored!
Celine Naef vs Himeno Sakatsume Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Naef 1 - 0 Sakatsume
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naef has won 47.99% of points on his second serve, while Sakatsume has won 45.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naef, in recent form, has won 55.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sakatsume has won 55.42%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.05% and 41.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naef has saved 54.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sakatsume has saved 51.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naef has won 53.57% of matches played (W/L 30/ 26), with Sakatsume winning 46.55% (W/L 27/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naef has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 43/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 23/ 17). Sakatsume has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 23/ 11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Naef has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.16% of matches (W/L 23/ 14), where as Sakatsume has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.34% of matches (W/L 19/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Naef winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Naef winning 2 and Sakatsume winning 0. The last match between Naef and Sakatsume was at the W75 Trnava, 08-03-2024, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Celine Naef getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Naef and Sakatsume have played a deciding set 0 times, with Naef winning 0 times and Sakatsume 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Naef winning 0, and Sakatsume 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naef has played against opponents with an average rank of 195.34 while Sakatsume has played against players with an average rank of 232.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naef has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sakatsume has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naef has converted 46.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sakatsume has converted 51.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
158
Rank
121
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
265
Rank
164
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
67% (87-43)
Career Total W/L
59% (161-112)
55% (17-14)
YTD W/L
46% (13-15)
$169,770
Career Prize Money
$21,560
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Celine Naef | Himeno Sakatsume |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:58:0 | 0:58:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (28/47) | 86% (30/35) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (23/28) | 43% (13/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (12/19) | 40% (2/5) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (20/35) | 26% (12/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Celine Naef
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
86%
(
30 of
35)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Celine Naef | Himeno Sakatsume |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (17/14) | 46% (13/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (41/30) | 46% (27/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (356/292) | 51% (265/252) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 56% (5/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 25% (2/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (11/8) | 55% (6/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 95 | 13 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 59 | 49 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:11 | 1:30:18 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 186.23 | 227.54 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1267/2087) | 69% (1189/1717) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (840/1267) | 57% (683/1189) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (394/820) | 46% (243/528) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (125/274) | 52% (105/202) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (967/2131) | 47% (759/1632) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 62% (16/10) | 50% (11/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (17/31) | 46% (12/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 22% (2/9) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (18/16) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (18/2) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (13/1) | 7% (15/1) |
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Celine Naef
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Celine Naef
63%
(
66 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
1
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Celine Naef
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Celine Naef
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Clara Burel
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Daria Saville
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Celine Naef
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Celine Naef
71%
(
77 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
70 of
113)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(8) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Celine Naef
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
12
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
72%
(
23 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Himeno Sakatsume Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
70 of
103)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
98
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Ayla Aksu
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
47%
(
18 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
60 of
83)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
42%
(
23 of
55)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
55%
(
42 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
47 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Bianca Compuesto
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve %
39%
(
12 of
31)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
8
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
58
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Malene Helgo
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arina Rodionova
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Naef Vs Sakatsume Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
